<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minority Report Predicted the Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.utahsrepublic.org/minority-report-predicted-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.utahsrepublic.org/minority-report-predicted-the-future/</link>
	<description>A Constitutional Right</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 18:48:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.utahsrepublic.org/minority-report-predicted-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-2604</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.utahsrepublic.org/?p=1431#comment-2604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for posting this, Oak. Question: how is this different from the behavioral profiling US Customs people do to nab bad guys at our borders, or the behavioral profiling Israel does to keep it&#039;s airports safe?

My understanding is that behavior profiling (asking questions and observing answers) is much more effective at finding bad guys than random searches, and it&#039;s a lot less invasive than a nakey scan or &quot;pat down.&quot; Is this just a tech-enhanced version, or something fundamentally different? Or do you find behavior profiling to be invasive?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this, Oak. Question: how is this different from the behavioral profiling US Customs people do to nab bad guys at our borders, or the behavioral profiling Israel does to keep it&#8217;s airports safe?</p>
<p>My understanding is that behavior profiling (asking questions and observing answers) is much more effective at finding bad guys than random searches, and it&#8217;s a lot less invasive than a nakey scan or &#8220;pat down.&#8221; Is this just a tech-enhanced version, or something fundamentally different? Or do you find behavior profiling to be invasive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
